This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Proposal to remove claim that state is best for EV charging[edit]
Clickbait headline aside, the actual content of the article disputes such a claim, as the metric is ratio of EVs to charging stations. However, this is profoundly misleading: Not all chargers are compatible, and (speaking from experience) many in ND don't put out enough juice to keep up with the cold and charge your car at the same time. As such, I'd argue it should be removed or revised to better indicate the actual state of using an EV within the region. Madwonk (talk) 03:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
