Talk:Pixelmator Classic

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

tweaked the article a little bit[edit]

I tweaked the article a little bit, added some references and removed the templates. IMHO: i didn't think it was that 'commercially written' at all. I've seen much worse :) Husky ^{(talk page)} 19:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the article[edit]

I removed the Future Changes section because it was outdated. I also added version 2.0 to the version history table. ConnorGriffin (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

Pixelmator has received criticism for not supporting graphics tablets pressure sensitivity[3]. It has also been criticized of being "sizzle over steak", in other words being over-hyped for an under-functional application [citation needed]

Well, I don't know if that's true but I do know that it supports it now, also, this program is blazingly fast! Wolfos1232 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

This is a completely useless section: One criticism with a single blog entry reference, and a vague statement without any references. I'm striking this. (And no, I'm not the developer. I'm not even a user.) --Steven Fisher 23:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. I tried to find references for those two statements, but the only thing i found was the blog reference, which i agree isn't quite substantial enough.

Husky ^{(talk page)} 16:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is to comercial! --212.93.140.102 (talk) 06:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]