Talk:PicoChip

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

COI[edit]

The COI flag was placed on this.

It is true I work for picoChip, and probably should have said that on TALK before, but have tried to follow NPOV and reference all statements. Re-reading it I'm not sure I would change anything? But if you feel I am biassed or POV then please edit & correct. I'm posting under my own name so am hardly sock-puppet.

As such I removed the flag. Rupert baines (talk) 15:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent Name?[edit]

The title page says 'PicoChip', but the article says 'Picochip', and there are a few other variations around... Which is correct?

When the company was first set up, it was styled picoChip (small initial p, capital C in the middle) as was fashionable in the 90s and early noughties. This was changed to Picochip (ie rendered like any other proper noun)in October/November 2010, in a corporate rebrand. So take your pick. It was never PicoChip. Andy Gothard (I was the Director of Corporate Marketing responsible for the '10 rebrand).

Initialisms[edit]

What is meant with GMACs, GIPS and LIW? --Abdull (talk) 21:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simply lookup the abbreviations using wp?

Programming PicoChips[edit]

gcc now supports the picochip [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.107.228 (talk) 06:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no more: "All GCC ports for the following processor architectures have been declared obsolete: picoChip (picochip-*)" according to [2] --Veob66MI (talk) 21:12, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]