Talk:Philippine Women's University

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Pwulogo.jpg[edit]

Image:Pwulogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parts of the article sound like adverts/buzzwords and peacock terms[edit]

The ff. parts of the article sound like adverts/buzzwords and peacock terms: "The Philippine Women's University... promotes Christian education and inter-faith ecumenism in the character formation of our learners...", "...with emphasis on the PWU Core Values of spirituality and ethical professionalism, cultural heritage and leadership in women's education, and professional competencies for global citizenship toward sustainable development", "PWU has proven itself to be an enduring institution", etc. I'm not familiar with the policy regarding these. Anyone more experienced care to comment on this, or direct me to what I can do to correct this? Galacticninja (talk) 06:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Excuse my poor wiki talk editing but the Chairman is dead since last year anyone got updates 1.127.49.1 (talk) 05:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC) source is the ref of the listed chairmain.[reply]