Talk:Peter-assment/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 16:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Not a problem with the citations.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Given that you include some criticism of a joke in the episode, the actual scene should be mentioned in the plot summary or recapped along with the criticism. As is, it's pretty out of context.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutrality seems okay to me.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- History is stable.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
Concerns addressed, article's good to go. Well done! GRAPPLE X 10:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)