Talk:Pearl (2022 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

"Pearl (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pearl (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 12#Pearl (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Theda et al.[edit]

I would not agree that noting/linking to association to Theda Bara is merely an Easter egg as (like Charlie, Mary, and Francis) since Pearl named all of her animals after Hollywood actors, indicating her obsession with becoming a movie star herself. OldSkoolGeek (talk) 00:10, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EASTEREGG clearly states 'Also remember there are people who print the articles...In a print version, there is no link to select, and the reference is lost.' That's the easiest test for whether something is an easter egg link. DonQuixote (talk) 00:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Why delete this"?[edit]

@Nyxaros: Mmm, repeated links, maybe ...? Because three links in one article seemed like one (or two) too many? So, when disambiguating the third link, I thought: one link in the lead, and one towards the bottom of the article seems reasonable: still mildly overlinked, if anything. Your relinking of the middle instance of The Wizard of Oz link now sees one link in the lead, one in the middle and one towards the end.

I think that's fine if you and others prefer the link repeated in that way, but don't see that the pointed ES query was called for. (I realise I neglected to mention in my ES I had unlinked one instance, my apologies for that oversight, but still ...) I see you've been editing for many years, so perhaps I have misunderstood MOS:LINKONCE and WP:SEAOFBLUE ... If so, again, my apologies. AukusRuckus (talk) 02:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

End of movie subliminal frame[edit]

Everyone talks about the final smiling scene, but after the copyright shot, the stylized film strip frames includes 1 subliminal frame of a face and two creatures on either side. I'm looking for sources talking about this to identify the man or creatures and the significance of it. 160.32.88.26 (talk) 04:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]