Talk:Patent Lens

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• The Lens
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:The Lens

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 October 2017. The result of the discussion was delete and redirect.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Disclosure[edit]

@Sampfire: Please disclose your client/employer. Stating that you were paid via Upwork is not sufficient per WP:PAID. Rentier (talk) 10:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sampfire: I took the liberty to cleanup the template you inserted as it did not render correctly. Rentier (talk) 15:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rentier Sampfire (talk) 02:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)No client/employer to discloseSampfire (talk) 02:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC) {{no connection to Cambi or the Lens to disclose. Another editor interrupting edits|}}Sampfire (talk) 02:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI / Advert tags[edit]

In my opinion the article will require significant copyediting before the tags can be removed. The problem is not so much with any particular phrase, but the overall structure and tone looks designed to show the subject in the best possible light. Some sections are completely unsourced and it's unclear whether their length and detail appropriately reflects the reliable coverage. The article should have been submitted for review before publication, but since it's been added directly to the main space, the tags need to stay. Rentier (talk) 15:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Patent Lens which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No need to keep edit history[edit]

The two edits with substantial content are nearly identical to this edit to Patent Lens a few minutes before by the same editor, AaronB549.

I'm noting this here due to the possibility of Patent Lens being moved to The Lens. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closed move discussion September 2020[edit]

For the closed move discussion please see Talk:The Lens#Requested move 3 September 2020. P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 01:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]