Talk:Passive euthanasia
 | Material from Passive euthanasia was split to Euthanasia on December 16 2009. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Merger proposal[edit]
In all honesty, I cannot see why Passive euthanasia was spun out in the first place. Five sentences in two paragraphs, from a single source, could all be easily kept in this article without any loss of information. I would myself support such a merger, based on the above. John Carter (talk) 16:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- My primary motive for creating a separate entry on passive euthanasia was that there was already a sub-division on voluntary euthanasia and involuntary euthanasia, which are ethical categories that are somewhat analoguous to the active/passive euthanasia dichotomy. ADM (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Letting die Merge propsoal[edit]
Could anybody explain me the difference between Letting die and Passive euthanasia? Geysirhead (talk) 07:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- That they are terms for similar events used by different communities of thought. I agree with your implication that a merge is warranted. As Passive euthanasia no longer exists as a stand-alone page, I imagine that you're arguing for a merge to Euthanasia#Passive and active euthanasia. That seems reasonable for me, on the grounds of short text and context. Klbrain (talk) 11:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)