Talk:Parallel programming model

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Implicit Parallelism[edit]

I'm just wandering if implicit parallelism is really a programming model, because parallelism isn't actually programmed in this case. But it uses one of the parallel programming models to realise parallelism. Is there an approved source for this fact?

This is the case with functional programming languages. I think it is a case worth distinguishing from explicit approaches to parallelism. JamieHanlon (talk) 08:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Programming Model vs. Programming Paradigm[edit]

In some literature the concepts mentioned here are called programming paradigms. The article just classified task and data parallelism as parallel programming paradigms. Even the term programming model is mapped to programming paradigm. I think, this has to be clarified.

I think we can just delete 'paradigm' from 'Main classifications and paradigms' and stick to the components of this article all being programming/computational models. JamieHanlon (talk) 08:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article references and quality[edit]

Is anyone babysitting this article? It has but one inline reference (Valiant's 1990 paper!) and is a long way from complete or well written. It is not "full or errors", but does have some problems of logic. Anyway, I will wait to see if anyone is working on it, else will add it to my clean up list for the next month. History2007 (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Opening of the article is off topic. It is about what a programming model is not about what the parallel programming model is. Cpgray (talk) 15:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I made some fairly major changes to this article in 2011. I agree it needs some more 'meat' and particularly some more references to existing work in the field. I would be happy to do some more work to this page to bring it up to scratch. Cpgray - I'm not sure that I agree with your comment, perhaps you could provide a little more justification? JamieHanlon (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[Untitled][edit]

Implicit Parallelism[edit] I'm just wondering if implicit parallelism is really a programming model because parallelism isn't actually programmed in this case. But it uses one of the parallel programming models to realize parallelism. Is there an approved source for this fact? This is the case with functional programming languages. I think it is a case worth distinguishing from explicit approaches to parallelism. JamieHanlon (talk) 08:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Programming Model vs. Programming Paradigm[edit] In some literature, the concepts mentioned here are called programming paradigms. The article just classified task and data parallelism as parallel programming paradigms. Even the term programming model is mapped to programming paradigm. I think this has to be clarified. I think we can just delete 'paradigm' from 'Main classifications and paradigms' and stick to the components of this article all being programming/computational models. JamieHanlon(talk) 08:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Article references and quality[edit] Is anyone babysitting this article? It has but one inline reference (Valiant's 1990 paper!) and is a long way from complete or well written. It is not "full or errors", but does have some problems of logic. Anyway, I will wait to see if anyone is working on it, else will add it to my clean up list for the next month. History2007 (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC) The opening of the article is off topic. It is about what a programming model is not about what the parallel programming model is. Cpgray (talk) 15:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC) I made some fairly major changes to this article in 2011. I agree it needs some more 'meat' and particularly some more references to existing work in the field. I would be happy to do some more work to this page to bring it up to scratch. Cpgray - I'm not sure that I agree with your comment, perhaps you could provide a little more justification? JamieHanlon(talk) 14:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Mathematics[edit]

Parallel 41.246.27.1 (talk) 09:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MATHEMATICS[edit]

How the world would be with parallel lines 41.246.27.1 (talk) 09:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]