Talk:Pappas v. Giuliani

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NYCLU = RS?[edit]

As much as I support and appreciate the work of civil liberties-defending groups like the New York Civil Liberties Union, I'm not sure it should be considered a reliable source in the context of describing a court ruling. (I have no reason to believe the particular information cited here is skewed or untrustworthy; it is on general principle that I raise the question.)

I see nothing in WP:RS about advocacy organizations, but my understanding is that their work should be referenced only to illuminate the organization itself, or when no other information about a subject is available (and then accompanied by an indication that the reader is consuming the perspective of an advocacy organization). Thoughts, other folks? Scartol • Tok 15:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pappas v. Giuliani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090519162319/http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayors-appellate-opinions-in-civil-cases/ to http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayors-appellate-opinions-in-civil-cases/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]