Talk:Panphagia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panphagia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New image[edit]

The caption on the new image added today appears to be wrong. The image is not of a skeleton; it's a single fossil. Firsfron of Ronchester 18:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, bad wording on my part, I was going to write something like "reconstruction of the skeleton as it was found. FunkMonk (talk) 18:32, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for rewording the caption. Any idea what part of the critter the fossil belongs to? Firsfron of Ronchester 18:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It should be the whole thing, you can see the head in the upper left corner. But it makes me wonder whether the fossil was actual that articulated when it was found, but there are no photos of the entire specime in the paper... FunkMonk (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]