Talk:Paid content

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Paid content. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not correct[edit]

I'm not a wikipedia editor, just a user who works in the video game industry. I just want to point out that the first two sentences of this article are completely wrong. Paid content is the opposite of free content; you have to pay to access it, hence the name. Paid content is also not usually public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.248.199 (talk) 22:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@76.102.248.199: Those were the two edits by 108.30.251.167 on 2 September 2020. This IP address is now blocked for long-term abuse. When you see something that's so blatantly wrong in an article, please view the article history to see whether it's just something that was recently changed, and if it is, please restore the article to its original state. In this case, it was simply vandalism by an anonymous IP address, so I reverted it.—J. M. (talk) 03:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]