Talk:PCTI Solutions

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability[edit]

I'm tagging this article with {{Notability}}. The only other source I've found is this regurgitated press release, which hardly qualifies as an independent source. Is there much other info around somewhere? -- Trevj (talk) 14:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User talk:Trevj § PCTI Solutions

Regarding your notability notice on the PCTI Solutions page:

You should look in the NHS Documentation linked to on the Page for PCTI and Docman. The company has over 50% market penetration in UK Primary Care providers (Doctor's Surgeries and Health Centres) and 70 hospitals. The whole of Scotland uses PCTI software.

Another place to find references is a publication called EHI Insider which is a specialist publication for implementation of electronic healthcare in the UK.

http://www.ehi.co.uk/search.cfm?searchterm=PCTI&summary=true

188.39.33.226 (talk) 13:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This sort of info will be more useful here than on my talk page. -- Trevj (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you (or anyone) feels as if sources like Surrey signs £325,000 deal with PCTI are sufficient to establish notability, please feel free to remove the tag. -- Trevj (talk) 16:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the notice on the grounds that I think being the supplier of a system that is deployed throughout every part of the NHS in Scotland is notable in its own right. Add to that the number of hospitals, health centres and GP Surgeries using PCTI products throughout England, Wales and Northern Ireland makes it even more notable.

http://www.ehi.co.uk/search.cfm?summary=true&searchTerm=EDT+Hub

http://www.ehi.co.uk/search.cfm?summary=true&searchTerm=Docman

188.39.33.226 (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't intend to reassess and reinstate the tag at the moment. However, it should be noted that the notability of such companies/systems isn't determined according to what editors think about where they're deployed, etc. but rather guidelines such as WP:NCORP. Also, it'd be most helpful to others if you could please use edit summaries. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 12:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]