Talk:Ovenbird (family)

Birds High‑importance

Ovenbird (family) is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Cleanup[edit]

Is megaxenops a genus? Currently it is a redirect to Xenops which makes to reference to the genus. I know nothing about this but it's left me utterly confused.

As discussed in several pages below the subfamily covering Xenops and true Treecreepers doesn't exist as is claimed .

I appreciate this not be simple a simple family but at the very least when a link is selected the user should be presented with information covering the section that was clicked. I.e. if you click on a subfamily the article covers only that subfamily, if a tribe is selected only that tribe is covered and so on.

As it stands navigating this family is far too confusing. JohnCastle 20:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Outcommented species so at least it is more compact now. "As discussed in several pages below the subfamily covering Xenops and true Treecreepers doesn't exist as is claimed ." - I see no references!? The 2004/2005 papers AGREE that the Xenopini are not subspecifically distinct from WOODcreepers! Treecreepers are an entirely distinct group of birds. Maybe the new 2006 study doesn't, which I will put here shortly; it should resolve a lot of what is unresolved. Dysmorodrepanis 00:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"As discussed in several pages below the subfamily covering Xenops and true Treecreepers doesn't exist as is claimed ." - checking the last publicatrions suggest that this statement is patently untrue. According to current knowledge, it exists exactly as given here, with a xenops and a true woodcreeper tribe. Megaxenops might belong to the former but its affiliations seem not to have been verified; it is fairly distinct and might belong to a different subfamily altogether.

The issue that Dendrocolaptinae redirects to Woodcreeper which is not correct needs to be resolved. See also my merge request. Dysmorodrepanis 01:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]