Talk:Ortnit

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ortnit/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It is just the brief text of the 1911 Britannica article. There must be an appropriate infobox for it. It has an illustration. It is well linked. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 01:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision[edit]

As it stands, this article uses a single 100-year-old source. And it's not just a question of adding further sources, since the basic premise of the Hartungs and a Germanic Ortnit figure is accepted by no-one these days, as far as I can see. The whole thing needs to be rewritten from scratch using more up-to-date source material. --Pfold (talk) 12:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref errors[edit]

Hi @Pfold: there are currently broken references to "Kofler 2008" and "Kofler 2009" on the page - I assume these are mistakes for one of the other Kofler cites on the page?--Ermenrich (talk) 13:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting these — will check when I have a bit more time. --Pfold (talk) 13:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]