This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Secret Societies, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Secret SocietiesWikipedia:WikiProject Secret SocietiesTemplate:WikiProject Secret SocietiesSecret Societies articles
I finally got the chance to look back at this article. I have tried to give it a more neutral and balanced tone. I moved the quote about religious beliefs from the opening to a more appropriate place. Perhaps the hostile tone of the article originates from the fact that all of my sources - Christian Cynosure. Preuss, Whalen - are all Christian anti-secret society sources. They seem to be the only sources used by Schmidt and Axelrod, the only secular writers I have found who have written about it. Also, lets face it, the Order has been implicated in criminal activity lately. What can we do to make it more neutral?--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
