This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
I've removed the graph claiming to represent coalitions as it's pure WP:OR. In many countries, graphs on coalitions make sense. In Sweden, the two main coalitions have been stable for decades. In the upcoming election, there are also stable coalitions, just as there were in the recent Norwegian elections. In this article, it is nonsense. There are no stable coalitions in Finnish politics, any party can govern with any other. The parties currently in government were not presenting themselves as a coalition at the latest elections, nor is there any indication they will do so in the next elections. A graph claiming to represent coalitions is meaningful only when coalitions exist. That's not the case here. Jeppiz (talk) 20:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
