This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
ORCA is one of several Afghan or Afghanistan-based opinion research organizations, and bills itself as "the largest full-service Afghan research center operating in the areas of market, media and opinion research." By that measure alone, even if others may claim to be larger, it would seem to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article.--A11n-research (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What the organization bills itself as is irrelevant, the question is: Can notability be established through third-party sources? That's what's required for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See WP:GNG, and more specifically, WP:ORG. Also, WP:RS to get an idea of what we mean when we say "third party sources". All I found were marketing materials. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:46, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Added info & citation from an academic paper, the data for which was obtained through ORCA. Removed delete tag.--A11n-research (talk) 12:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]