Talk:Operation Southern Watch

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Southern Watch article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Iraq

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biased?[edit]

I'm not sure where this is biased or how to unbias it. The closest thing to a bias I see is the mention that Iraq engaged in several aggressive acts -- but this is a military term, not a political one. The actions of the Iraqi military can be properly classified as aggressions, regardless of the intent. Perhaps rewording the sentence would help?

LordHedgie 23:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was the tagger. I agree with you that it's hard to see where it's biased, and I may have been a little too quick on the POV trigger. However, the whole article _feels_ Ameri-centric and imperialist. Don't know how that feeling can be translated into constructive edits though. Rusty 02:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]