Talk:OpenRISC 1200

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Performance[edit]

I'm not sure the performance figures are at all helpful, and in the absence of a citation, I find them very hard to believe. The OpenRISC typically runs on FPGA's clocked at 25-50MHz, although the latest FPGAs can wind that up closer to 100MHz. There are known issues with the implementation of the caches and MMUs that constrain performance. Jeremybennett (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following discussion with various OpenCores contributors, no one seems to believe these are credible performance data. In the absence of a citation, I propose removing them (and possibly replacing them with substantiated data). Jeremybennett (talk) 20:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added CoreMark information, which is more useful compared to the often-inflated Dhrystone MIPS numbers that get bandied about. Juliusbaxter (talk) 20:41, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The statement "1W at full throttle and less than 5mW at half throttle" lacks plausibility. 2.246.74.215 (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

The history section was wrong, reflecting a confusion between the OpenRISC 1000 (which is an architectural specification for a family of processors) and the OpenRISC 1200 which was the first implementation of that architecture. Text corrected. Jeremybennett (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]