Talk:Olivia S. Mitchell

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

University of Pennsylvania

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of University of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image(s) be included in this article to improve its quality.

Untitled[edit]

I removed excessive external links in the "Works" section and made them into footnotes where appropriate. I also made the minor edit of correcting the misspelled "Department" in the first reference. 3005shdh (talk) 16:43, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made the minor edit of fixing the reference for "National Bureau of Economic Research." 3005shdh (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Notability tag, taking a look at the article I see the following possible criteria for establishing notability (from WP:Notability: - I count at least 5 awards (1 international) in the "Works" section, plus two honorary doctorates - Mitchell is described as being "IFEBP Professor," which seems to be a named appointment at the University of Pennsylvania, which is a major American university. - She's described as serving on the Bush administration's "President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security," and as a part of government should count as work/influence outside academia. Does anyone else think this establishes notability? 3005shdh (talk) 14:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do. I also have no connection with Professor Mitchell other than having studied her work and I think this article is fine. 67.173.10.34 (talk) 19:35, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Larry Siegel[reply]

header added; moved to bottom of page[edit]

I added recent (2009-2011) books to the list of publications, and I updated the link to Professor Mitchell's CV (available on the Wharton website). In what specific ways should the article be modified to improve its neutral point of view? Statements asserting her prominence in the field are supported by external references (e.g. citations for awards). In the interest of full disclosure, I am an employee of the Pension Research Council, and work with Professor Mitchell. Btr773 (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any problems. I think that tag has been there long enough. You have been very patient. RockMagnetist (talk) 06:33, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]