This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jacksonville, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.JacksonvilleWikipedia:WikiProject JacksonvilleTemplate:WikiProject JacksonvilleJacksonville articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Are there independant sources that refer to it specifically by "Old St. Andrew's Episcopal Church"? -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
CommentThe current church would like to make their own wikipedia page and would like to minimize confusion screams "self-promotion". It makes me want to pre-emptively prevent creation of a page on the current church until it has gone through a review in "Draft" space first. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now: Until there is a draft article for the current church which clearly shows that the church meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines, there is no reason to move this. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also apprehensive about an organisation seeking to write their own article, but that shouldn't prevent us from moving this article if Old St. Andrew's is truly the building's new common name. BegbertBiggs (talk) 18:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.