Talk:OVHcloud

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the OVHcloud article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DMCAs, Spammers, and Scrapers[edit]

Look around the net and you'll see that OVH doesn't cease activity of DMCAs, spammers, and scrapers. I think we should list this. 2.107.66.110 (talk) 23:07, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikileaks news add to page notability[edit]

Now may be the time to restore the article, and add this new info: OVH is now servicing wikileaks, and for this is under pressure by the French government. The case has been submitted to a judge, which is expected to take a decision by today or tomorrow. Sources: [1][2][3][4].--Sum (talk) 16:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikileaks being hosted here certainly makes this a notable page now 129.186.57.95 (talk) 02:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - clearly now notable in world news. --Mervyn (talk) 10:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikileaks legal situation wrongfully confirmed[edit]

From what I read on the german forums of OVH the judges rejected the cases because of formal reasons and that's also what the AFP press release says. They did neither confirm nor deny the legality of hosting wikileaks in france. So if anyone would go on and sue OVH or their customer, the decision could go either way. It was just this special process OVH choose where there are no two parties involved but only one asking for clarification that is formally not correct for such situations. The Article however states that court ruled against censorship. From my point of view they did not say that. If anyone can confirm my concerns please edit the article so that it is correctly displaying the situation correctly. IANAL and especially don't know french law situation (might be I misunderstood it and the rejection of that special 2 cases also means that anyone trying to sue OVH or their customer would also get rejected automatically, but that's not what it looks like to me) also I am no native english speaker and am not sure how to phrase that unambigious. --Mastacheata (talk) 00:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I now decided to write the changes myself after reading the UK Forums entry by OVH. Seems to be the same post in all their country support forums, so I linked the UK one since that one is in english. --Mastacheata (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forums and blogs are not reliable sources. --Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are if it's a press release posted by the company's director, which this is. --Razakel19 (talk) 21:52, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality - I added template[edit]

I guess this problem is common with articles about companies, but here goes:

The article, to me, reads largely like advertising. Example: in the intro paragraph, "sponsors the free certificate authority Let's Encrypt," - OVH are one of around seven platinum sponsors, but here it sounds (at least to me) like they're sponsoring "Let's Encrypt" alone.

The sections on their products and such I find of similiar (poor / advertising) quality....

Regards 149.172.42.242 (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. it was nice to hear about LetsEncrypt though :) .

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). :) -- intgr [talk] 08:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A translation in Dutch submitted today has been deleted from NLwiki, because of copyvio. I don't know the rules on this wiki about what to do. Could anyone help me? Wikiwerner (talk) 17:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic article, barely any references[edit]

Wikipedia has quality standards which this article does not meet. Chunks of information on the OVH page are completely unreferenced, and sometimes sound promotional. OVH is a great company, and their business advancements are widely documented, so whoever contributed has been really lazy #bloodyshame.

I will take it upon me to improve this article, but any help is welcomed. Amin (Talk) 13:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]