Talk:Nursing in Australia/GA1

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 20:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fail—empty sections with maintenance templates. Too many such templates are grounds for an immediate failure. Criteria 3 of the good article criteria also stipulates that an article be broad in its coverage and there are evidently many sections missing. Articles should be relatively complete before nomination. As for the citations and images, they look quite adequate. Some sections, namely § History of nursing education and § Nurse practitioners, have some sentences which need citing. Other lines, like "(See examples)" and URLs ("accredited nursing education programs") are not necessary, and "(ENs)" and "registered nurse" do not have to have boldfaced text. The grammar, scope and section formatting look pretty good thus far, however. Once the sections are complete and everything is cited with reliable sources—and the text looks adequate—you can definitely renominate this article. This article certainly has potential and you seem really dedicated to writing it. Goodluck, and feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you ever have any questions. I'll try my best to answer them to the best of my abilities :) ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 20:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.