Talk:Nick and Nora Charles
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments[edit]
- Simplified introduction by creating Synopsis section.
- Question relevance: Their banter provides comic relief of the type that would later be seen between John Steed and Emma Peel in The Avengers.? I have left it in the meantime as it provides some context to the relationship of Nick and Nora.
- Synopsis requires expansion to give sense of the story.
--Haruth (talk) 21:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
synopsis is contradictory: was nick a private detective or police officer? If both, it should be clarified.
99.121.237.43 (talk) 01:50, 13 October 2010 (UTC)AB, Ypsilanti
Synopsis[edit]
I hate to say it, but the synopsis has some really sloppy writing. I did some grammar editing but the text is still redundant. The reader doesn't need to be preached to about her being a socialite and the family believing her to have married beneath her as it is mentioned, nearly word for word, twice. Were I more familiar with the films, I would take a stab at it. Maybe I will anyway. I think a comparison of the book characters and movie characters are in order, but also a discussion about their personality. The only personality that is mentioned here is his love of drink and little else. Also I can't stand to see "&" in the middle of any sentence. I took those out straight away. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 05:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have extensively edited the entry to address the concerns raised above and to put the entry into more appropriate encyclopedia format. However, although I have as a consequence reduced significantly the personal commentary and original research contained in the entry, it was almost completely unsourced. I have not been able to address that, very serious problem this go-round. TheCormac (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Reads like a studio promotion of the whole series[edit]
This sycophantic article is all about promoting the films, very contrary to NPOV. It supplies no critical thinking or discussion of any kind. I think the whole article should be rewritten, using links to existing articles on each film. As a Wikipedia article this is currently pointless.
- C-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- C-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- C-Class novel articles
- Low-importance novel articles
- C-Class Crime fiction task force articles
- Unknown-importance Crime fiction task force articles
- WikiProject Novels articles