Talk:Never Again (The X-Files)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNever Again (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starNever Again (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 4) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 9, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 14, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Fair use rationale for Image:Never Again 4x13.jpg[edit]

Image:Never Again 4x13.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Never Again (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 14:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues:

  • Lede: Link science fiction
  • Lede: Try to add UK airing
  • Reception: On Fox network, only Fox should be linked
  • Reception: Try to add UK airing
  • External links: Add TheXFiles.com link

That's all. Great work. On hold for now. TBrandley 14:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed all the issues. Thank you for the review.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:35, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Never Again (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Betty? or Bettie?[edit]

Both the article and the internet at large seem to have an even split. Giving up. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 18:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Meisler book spells it "Betty", so I'd defer to that. That's just my thought, tho.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 05:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]