Talk:Nettwerk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion[edit]

The page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --59.101.189.250 (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing[edit]

The page feels like it was very much written by Nettwerk's marketing team, which is fine, I guess, but I find it weird that it completely glosses over the company's history and significance to industrial music in the '80s and early '90s. At some point they pivoted entirely to Mom Jeans Adult Contemporary, and I'm sure there were compelling business reasons to do this, but there's a huge bit of musical history that's being ignored here. I do not have the time or capacity to edit this page with the detail it deserves -- and certainly don't want to get into a prolonged edit war with a marketer who wants to reaffirm Nettwerk's current direction -- but just wanted to point this out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.104.168.203 (talk) 11:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point, but it may also be that there are just more references available for their post-80s growth into the mainstream. I'm about to dump some new info into the article; here's to hoping that your edit war doesn't come to pass :) -- t_kiehne (talk) 04:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Chrisahn: - You put the Advert tag on the article - I'll leave it to you to determine if my edits address your concerns. Thanks -- t_kiehne (talk) 05:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Distribution[edit]

The note, "In 1994, Nettwerk switched its distribution from Capitol–EMI to Sony Music, later Sony BMG" is incomplete. It should read as U.S. distribution as the Canadian distribution for Nettwerk remained with EMI in Canada until end of 2005. It was not until 2006 that the Canadian distribution of Nettwerk switched to Sony BMG.[1] The Canadian distribution remained with Sony in Canada until about 2019 or 2020. Moonlightfocus (talk) 07:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

"Lily Kershaw" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Lily Kershaw and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 21 § Lily Kershaw until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris talk! 17:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]