Talk:Neil Sperry

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Arbitrary section 1[edit]

There is probably very good reason why no other articles link to this one. This is a very obscure article. Stevenmitchell 13:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major rewrite/version-merge[edit]

The article was basically replaced by a promotional piece on 02:59, 15 October 2007 by Friend of Neil (talk · contribs). I replaced it with the previous version of 15:16, 19 December 2006 by Chrislk02 (talk · contribs) then did my best to merge in the encyclopedic info from the spammy version. Unfortunately, most of the stuff from the spammy version was unsourced, and the only sourced I could find were not independent. As-is, this will never be a good article. It needs major improvements and by far most of the items must be sourced from independent sources or removed. The subject of the article is definately Wiki-notable, so this shouldn't be too hard. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]