Talk:Nazis: The Occult Conspiracy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Occultconspiracy.jpg[edit]

Image:Occultconspiracy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with this article[edit]

Some issues to note:

  • The "Synopsis" section. Is this just a package blurb? If so this should be clearly stated and it should be in quotation form.
  • The "See also" section. Much too many unneeded or only tangentially-related links, does not comply with WP:SEEALSO.
  • The "External links" section. The link to watch the film, although contained at www.occultconspiracy.com, it may still be in violation of our policy on not linking to copyrighted works. I have posted a query at WP:ELN regarding the link.

-- œ 13:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Issues have been resolved by another editor. -- œ 18:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]