Talk:Nazarov cyclization reaction/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 02:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:08, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Why is axial to tetrahedral chirality transfer highlighted in red text?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The article is sufficiently referenced, sources appear to be RS, I assume ggod faith for those sources which are inaccessible to me, no evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images need captions explaining their sourcing.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just a couple of points which need to be addressed. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:17, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

   OK, thanks for the fixes. I didn't make myself clear about the captions. They are fine now. Listing as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 23:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Modifications based on review

• I've removed the broken link to tetrahedral-to-axial chirality. It was originally going to be a pet project based on this page, but I didn't have the time to write it in the mean time.
• I've added licences to the images that were missing them on their respective wikimedia pages; I'm not sure what you mean about having the licences in the captions as that's not usually something I see on other pages. Let me know if I'm wrong, but there are plenty of good articles that do not have this.

Thanks for taking the time to review my work! M.Levin 06:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

EDIT: I've changed all the figures to thumb-type images so that the captions are visible without hovering over. Hopefully this is in line with what you wanted? M.Levin 18:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)