Talk:Nasty Old People

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is it really the first feature film released on TPB? Brorsan Såsett was released on TPB too. But I'm not really sure what feature film means :)

"Steal This Film" and it's sequel "Steal This Film II" were both released on TPB, but they are documentaries. I hesitate to change this without citation.Kid Bugs (talk) 04:04, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now hold on please....![edit]

I stumbled on this film today (via Nasty Old People (2009) & looking around found it intriguing & its wikipage. This film was released on 10 October & on the 14th Roger W Haworth proposed its page for deletion on 21st October for "Lack of notability". That alone makes me interested in looking at it, which I may not have time to do before the 21st. Mr Haworth has 'achieved' 4000 deletions-I have nothing personally against him & am glad he has achieved many more edits. Cleanup is useful, but this film is creative, collaborative & offered freely as a service for admirable motives-I think it should be allowed to flourish & encouraged in all ways possible-I love the accessibility of wikipedia, lets use & never abuse it. I propose to allow this page to grow-it now is in 2 other languages. DadaNeem (talk) 21:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have now seen the trailer & probably won't look further, but defend it's right to be shared & seen. Also added some edits to the page & I agree with the above comment that it may not be the first feature film on piratebay. DadaNeem (talk) 21:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

> It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern: no evidence of notability

Can the person who proposed this deletion explain why these other 1330 films from 2009 which currently have a wikipedia page are more notable than Nasty Old People? I am sure that most people never heard of at least 1300 of those movies. Nasty Old People on the other hand has already created notability by being released under a CC license (the first time in Sweden I understand) and uses it's fan base to distribute, improve and promote the movie much in the same fashion as open source software does. That is in itself unique for a movie. Though I don't doubt that others have tried this before, it's at least more notable than most of the other 1330 movies from 2009. So when you're done deleting the wikipedia pages for the other 1300 non-notable movies from 2009, we can talk about deleting this one. In the mean time I absolutely vote against deletion. Instead I propose tagging the page as a stub and calling on people to help improve it without the threat of deletion. --Ottodv (talk) 18:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I find it disturbing that someone who clearly has no understanding of the subject matter has taken it upon himself to propose deletion of this (or any article) without taking time to do some basic research first. A few minutes of simple research would have shown that this article is of considerable "notability".

Although Wikipedia may be a magnet for self-serving garbage articles, those who chose to police such should not allow themselves to fall into the habit of deleting with the same lack of concern as the garbage posters. Perhaps he should stick to subjects that he is familiar with. Kid Bugs (talk) 03:16, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First[edit]

Contrary to the marketing claim that this is the first CC film. Elephants Dream was released over 3 years ago under CC. So unless someone can provide some reliable sources indicating otherwise (I can't possibly imagine how) I'm going to remove the claim in a day.--Crossmr (talk) 23:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even this year, Big Buck Bunny [1] was released in January.--Crossmr (talk) 06:07, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nasty Old People. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://nastyoldpeople.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nasty Old People. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091014224212/http://www.arbetaren.se/articles/kultur20080115 to http://www.arbetaren.se/articles/kultur20080115

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]