Talk:Nancy Temple

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV, weasel word and reference issues[edit]

There are some problems with the article as currently written. First, there are no references cited to verify any statements in the article. Second, the article had a number of "weasel words", such as talking about how "many" attorneys and accountants felt a particular way about a subject with no documentation backing up the statement. Finally, the last paragraph of the article appeared to be significantly biased, and again made statements with no direct citations.

I therefore removed the final paragraph entirely, and revised the wording on other parts of the text to remove some of the "weasel" phrases. I also tagged the article for references. Hopefully they addresses some of the POV issues I saw and will spur someone to add some citations to verify the article's statements. Dugwiki 21:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a legal expert, but there are some references out there that support the last paragraph. However, I agree with you that it needs to be reworded and cited.H.al-shawaf (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]