Talk:NOVO7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New Models - What Is CPU Type?[edit]

There is speculation the new NOVO7 models, Aurora and Elf, might be ARM Cortex-A8 based, but I prefer proof from the manufacturer before stating it in the article. Please drop a link here to an OFFICIAL article. • SbmeirowTalk • 17:05, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The processor may be in the Samsung Electronics Exynos family, such as the Exynos 4210 (1.2 or 1.4GHz) or Exynos 4212 (1.2 or 1.5GHz), especially since both have Mali-400 GPU. Since information and rumors have listed by 1.2GHz and 1.5GHz for the new NOVO7 products, then the Exynos 4212 might be it. Both are dual-core ARM Cortex-A9, instead of the rumored A8. These support DDR3, which is stated in the NOVO7 literature. • SbmeirowTalk • 18:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/products/mobilesoc/Exynos/products4210.html
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/products/mobilesoc/Exynos/products4212.html
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/products/mobilesoc/Exynos/news_10.html
The processor may also be in the ST-Ericsson NovaThor family, such as the NovaThor U8500 or NovaThor U9500, especially since both have Mali-400 GPU and 1080p. Both are dual-core ARM Cortex-A9, instead of the rumored A8. The reason these might not be the chips is both support only DDR2, instead of the DDR3 stated in the NOVO7 literature.
http://www.stericsson.com/products/u8500-novathor.jsp
http://www.stericsson.com/products/u9500-novathor.jsp
I still need final proof.

New Models - What Is CPU Speed?[edit]

I'm not sure if the new models are 1.2 GHz or 1.5 GHz speed? Some specs say 1.2 Ghz, but others 1.5GHz. • SbmeirowTalk • 17:16, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles[edit]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on NOVO7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]