Talk:NHS Connecting for Health

Politics of the United Kingdom High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Health Service (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Health Service, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National Health ServiceWikipedia:WikiProject National Health ServiceTemplate:WikiProject National Health ServiceNational Health Service articles

Scale back[edit]

Largest civilian IT project in the world, so counts as important to UK politics and UK health. As of 22/9/11 one newspaper (Daily Mail) announced scrapped, but that not the case (as usual Daily Mail having a non-news fronta page headline: the press releases were all a week ago). I've tried to work in The Guardian item explaining the difference between the Daily Mail's lead story and what has actually been said and how this fits historically.

So much of the additional software to run on the establised infrastructure is to be cancelled (?patient records, ?electronic prescribing - but not really clear what parts of 'National Programme for IT' remains) but existing systems stay and for local purchased solutions whatever that means. Lead updated, but main article needs a major section expanding out what is staying, what goes, or what remains under review. David Ruben ^Talk 18:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on NHS Connecting for Health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]