Talk:Musical acoustics

Professional sound production High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics: Acoustics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Acoustics Taskforce.

Archives

/Archive 1 (March 2007)

Cognition[edit]

What differentiates Musical acoustics from Music Cognition? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.229.186.182 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Acoustics doesn't necessarily deal with the mind or psychology, etc (though it sometimes does). Musical Cognition would naturally use acoustics as a working tool, but they are really very different fields. - Rainwarrior 06:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consonance/dissonance and beat frequency[edit]

The article states that a 3/2 ratio (perfect fifth) is consonant, using the example frequencies of 300 and 200 Hz. In the same section, it states both that the beat frequency can be calculated as the difference between the two frequencies and that a higher beat frequency leads to a higher probability that the combination is dissonant. It uses the same example along with another one with a 1 Hz difference. This part of the article is unclear and should be cleaned up by someone with better knowledge than I have. But, at the very least, the article should not claim that a perfect fifth is more dissonant than a chord composed of two notes only 1 Hz apart. Ari (talk) 22:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does any one know (of) a formula for the frequency of timpani?[edit]

Is there a formula giving the frequency of a kettledrum in terms of the tension of its drumhead, its superficial density and its radius, analogous to the well-known formula ${{1}/{2L}}{\sqrt {{T}/{\mu }}}$ that gives the frequency of a string in terms of its tension, linear density and length? I realize that, contrary to the case of a string, this would have to be a formula specific to the kettledrum, not a property of any circular membrane, since for a two-dimensional membrane the spectrum can be quite complicated and not even give a definite frequency (e.g. the case of the kick drum). Does the book by John Backus "The Acoustical Foundations of Music" have anything about membranophones? Contact Basemetal here 07:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Musical acoustics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010613120620/http://www.public.coe.edu/~jcotting/tcmu/ to http://www.public.coe.edu/~jcotting/tcmu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]