Talk:Morissette v. United States

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

U.S. Supreme Court cases Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I will be working on this article. Please don't mistake this for vandalism. Non Curat Lex 00:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. Something's missing.[edit]

M was convicted, first in a trial court, presumably a U.S. District Court. The conviction was appealed to a federal appeals court. Which circuit was it? From there the case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. 2600:8801:BE01:7C00:8E2D:DAEA:B00E:D545 (talk) 04:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section clean-up[edit]

The Lead section of this article is too long and detailed. It should be a summary of the detail in the body of the article, highlighting only the essential points. As a reader, I feel I want to stop at the end of the opening paragraph and insert a heading like "Summary of facts", to divide an excellent summary of the case from an excellent summary of the facts about the particular case, that I don't really need to know if I don't want to read any further. While lead sections can be up to four sections long, length of the lead section also needs to be proportionate to the overall length of the article. The current readable prose size of this article is significantly less than the article's ~8,000 character length might suggest, with more than half the article's text being in the lead, the lead is much too long. Advice that quality lead sections are generally less than 300 words, irrespective of article size and complexity, indicates the lead for this article should be limited to the first paragraph and perhaps one other. See MOS:LEAD and MOS:LEADLENGTH. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]