This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article was redirected to Wife selling by Aman.kumar.goel, citing "Redundant POV fork; Wife selling already exists". Wife selling is selling someone who is already your wife. Money marriage, as the article showed, was to get someone married to settle a debt. The Wife selling article does not mention money marriage or its instances, so I do not understand why this information should be deleted for being "redundant". Additionally, even if the Wife selling article did mention about money marriage, money marriage may only be a part of a wider phenomenon of wife selling and so not be synonymous as wife selling. Similarly, an article like debt slavery is not synonymous with slavery but is a part of slavery and so can have its own article for further information. Thus, I do not know how having its own article is a "POV fork". JustBeCool (talk) 16:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Still no difference between the two concepts. Read WP:POVFORK properly and don't resort to grossly improper WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. There is no need to retain your garbage article and put wikipedia's credibility on stake just because you want us to do so. NavjotSR (talk) 05:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You did not address what I took the time the write so I do not know what to reply here. You are not making an argument, it is just sending WP links you have seen before, anybody can do that, lol. JustBeCool (talk) 17:29, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Those polices are supposed to be read. Doesn't matter how you "took the time the write". Capankajsmilyo (talk) 01:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Took the time to write" means what I bring up is not addressed anyway, so I did not know what else to bring up. Those policies were read, they are just not applying here. JustBeCool (talk) 02:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
