Talk:Moira, Goa

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Goa (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Am appealling to more Moira-linked people in cyberspace to contribute to this page. Also made an appeal through Moira-Net --fredericknoronha 19:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. Xavier's High School, Moira[edit]

St. Xavier's High school was established in the year - . It is located at Novo Portugal waddo. It is a diocese school.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Moira, Goa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121016010220/http://thejackalnews.com/default.php?dll=1673 to http://www.thejackalnews.com/default.php?dll=1673%20&readmore=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moira, Goa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/1503/eminent-goans.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Wise fools" section[edit]

I have hidden this content for the time being, because it was poorly explained, poorly sourced, and didn't improve the article. If someone feels strongly about the content being included, it should not be at the top of the page, and considerably more context will be needed, to explain why the "wise fools" this is relevant. This has been attracting a considerable amount of vandalism from a person/people who seem to find it slanderous, and while the vandalism was inappropriate, I think this section is inappropriate as well, at least in its current form. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 20:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]