Talk:Mitral valve replacement

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

references[edit]

Where are they? Seems they cannot be accessed. EtherDoc (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, now I have returned actual refernces to the text. I don't like using websites as references, but it's a start. Journal articles and books are better. Today I have returned the references to the original website references so at least readers can click on a reference and actually get somewhere. Before today the references were renamed without linking them to anything. I would appreciate if anyone could subsitute actual books or journal articles instead of the websites used. Thanks. EtherDoc (talk) 19:18, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


It states in the article that "When the valve is too damaged to repair, the valve must be replaced with an artificial valve[6]." This is not necessarily so! One solution is to replace the mitral valve of the patient with one from a human cadaver, which is obviously not artificial. Another option is to use a pig (porcine) mitral valve or a mechanical one, both of which I suppose are artificial (i.e. non-human). 

  - yes I have fixed this EtherDoc (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would have edited the article, but I have not the faintest idea how. I should be grateful if someone could research this point, and if they agree with me to edit for me.

Thanks.

John195.194.36.193 (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

mytral valve help[edit]

i just found out i need a mytral valve replacement, has anyone had one or would like to talk to me about it please. i have to hve the surjery on monday my name is sharifah and i live in north carolina. i welcome any advice from people who needone or have had this procedure thank you``````` —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.11.93.254 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

update needed[edit]

The complications and survival rate reported is for 1990-96. this is twenty years later, and things should be different.

Additionally, ref 6 is an advertisement, emphasisizing the good results atthat particular center. It should not be used. DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

odd language in "risks" section[edit]

Regarding: "One wonders whether any of the patients in either group in this analysis underwent any mechanical cardiac valve replacement." This sentence suggests original research and also seems out of place. What analysis is it talking about? --Allen (talk) 14:07, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mitral valve replacement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mitral_valve_replacement&oldid=1200308892"