Talk:Miss World 2016

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of beauty pageants, their contestants and winners on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Beauty PageantsWikipedia:WikiProject Beauty PageantsTemplate:WikiProject Beauty PageantsBeauty Pageants articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Judges[edit]

Is it possible to add a section naming the judges of the event? Also, Megan Young was not the only host. Who were the co-hosts?72.245.246.219 (talk) 01:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues[edit]

I tagged the article concerning primary sources:

Part of the notability guidelines are covered under the section General notability guideline that states; "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.", and includes "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention...", and "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it.

One problem with the article is that sources that are not "directly" involved with the subject, are otherwise affiliated with the subject. Sources such as MGM National Harbor Newsroom is a press release from MGM. eltribuno.info is titled Elena Roca will not be Miss World Argentina 2016 with statements from the "Miss World Argentina Organization" with a mention of "Miss World". The-star.co.ke is titled Miss World Kenya dropped by franchise over 'grave situation'. These sources support content, specifically WP:BLP's, which is a separate issue.

The point is that the subject should be notable enough that there are reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Otr500 (talk) 02:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miss World 2016. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001090215/http://www.missworld.com/Contestants/ to http://www.missworld.com/contestants/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]