Talk:Miss Asia Pacific World/Archives/2023 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Dont be Remove Again

Please! give them an opportunity to move. Miss Asia Pacific World is still young pageant and please give them 2nd chance to change their format as good pageant. So please dont be remove, we should be support this pageant and be appreciate them, because it's difficult to create good pageant like Miss Universe, Miss World and other grand slam pageants. so please be appreciate them and dont be remove, if Miss Asia Pacific will be crzy and be controversy, u can remove this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrdhimas (talkcontribs) 18:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Until this pageant is notable, then it is not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 01:36, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
See below. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Some reliable sources added to the article

  • "Bristol teenage beauty queen flees South Korean pageant". BBC News. October 19, 2011. Retrieved May 18, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  • "Sex scandal at Miss Asia Pacific World Photogenic 2011, won by a Romanian. Contestant makes shocking disclosures". Bucharest Herald. October 27, 2011. Retrieved May 18, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  • "Scandal-ridden beauty pageant organizers checking for misconduct". The Korea Times. October 21, 2011. Retrieved May 18, 2012. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
Northamerica1000(talk) 02:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

This article is only being kept for its Controversy

This article is only being kept for its Controversy in 2011, as its in this area where the coverage for this topic is most significant. As ruled out in its AfD. The neutrality of this article is currently disputed for whether to change up the information in the section "History", which could possibly be read as a promotional text. Please discuss below. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 14:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Merge

Should we follow trough with the merge of the articles Miss Asia Pacific World 2011, Miss Asia Pacific World 2012 and Miss Asia Pacific World 2013 into this the main article which was the consensus of the AfD. --BabbaQ (talk) 11:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm interested in how we are going to do this. I think we should ax all of the contestant information because it is just more intricate detail that would only interest 1 or 2 people; let alone create a massive article. The recent results of each year may be fine. The lead section of each article should be merged too. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Stub assessment

I have assessed this article as Stub-class for WikiProject Beauty Pageants because the article contians a lot of irrelevant information such as results. The actual amount of useful encyclopedic information about this subject is small enough to be classified as a Stub.

The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.

— Criteria for Stub-class article, WikiProject article quality grading scheme

--Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Major contributor blocked

Please note that a major contributor to this article, Mrskorea (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · block log), was blocked on 6 December 2013 for a violation of the username policy after making promotional edits. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 13:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Recent modifications

Recent changes have turned it into "Miss Asia Pacific World 2014". The previous version was a mess. I can't make heads or tails of it. Maybe it needs sections for a summary of each year. Please help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Likely copyvios

If someone knows the source of these, please say. I suspect they are copyright violations.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:52, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Deleted--Ymblanter (talk) 13:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Accounts to watch

User talk:Mapwwide (means Miss Asia Pacific World Wide) appears to have an undeclared conflict of interest and has been using Wikipedia as a promotional tool. Given frequent sock attacks, SPI may be appropriate. It also violates Username Policy. SWH® talk 06:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miss Asia Pacific World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Miss Asia Pacific World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)