Talk:Misfit stream

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sounds interesting. Does anybody know how geologists can tell the stream is a misfit? Speciate 04:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)speciate[reply]

  • If the valley the stream is occupied has the characteristics of a glacial trough we can be confident that the stream is misfit. It is also possible to find chalk streams that occupy large valleys that were formed under different climatic conditions. I will aim to improve this article in the near future. Milton25 18:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now improved a bit...off in search of a photo.Milton25 22:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo added. Milton25 20:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Misfit stream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not just the Hinuera Gap[edit]

I think it's not just this small section that shows a misfit between the water that is presently flowing in it and the clifs that were cut through hard rocks. All the Hauraki valley width and deposits and possibly the firth of Thames show the ancient action of a huge river flowing there in the past? I see no recent mention of the 'graben theory' for the Hauraki plains. Modern maps don't show faults on its margins, as should logically happen? sorry my bad they DO (but because they are not considered active faults, are missing often): https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/5316/3.%20Ham%20basin%20soils%20Lowe%20%202010.pdf?sequence=1 stefjourdan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:7000:B067:E200:305A:4D3:CA2E:FE6E (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]