Talk:Minehead Without

Civil parish status[edit]

Unfortunately we have conflicting information on the civil parish status of Minehead Without. The ONS reference cited is pretty clear that it *is* a civil parish. The national park reference cited just calls it a parish, and says that it is joined with Selworthy as a civil parish. However they also say there is no church, which presumably means it cannot be an eccliastical parish, so it is not clear what sort of parish they think it is.

I'm no great expert on civil parish administration, but from something I've read sometime, I think it is possible for two civil parishes to share a single parish council without actually merging the parishes. It may be that this is what the national park web site is trying to say, but inferences based on something I've read sometime is hardly WPworthy.

So I've chosen to go with the ONS, as I suspect they know more about what constitutes a civil parish than the national park. If anybody can find a resolving reference, please feel free to adjust appropriately. -- Starbois (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are right and it was one of the "parishes" (I believe civil) which were still on the wanted list of Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset (which you might like to join). A bit of digging leads me to Vision of Britain page about Minehead Without (based on ONS). This shows it (see relationships & changes) as a civil parish since 1894 but with boundary changes in 1916.— Rod ^talk 18:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Minehead Without. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minehead Without. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081009014710/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/geographic_area_listings/downloads/PAR_DEC_2007_EN_NC.xls to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/geographic_area_listings/downloads/PAR_DEC_2007_EN_NC.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]