Talk:Miller Arnold case

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 19:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by WatkynBassett (talk). Self-nominated at 19:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @WatkynBassett: I normally don't contribute to Wikipedia in relation to legal topics. But as I am a lawyer who can speak German, it seemed appropriate that I review this nomination, especially as the new article appeared to be about a very interesting topic. I prefer the first hook, as what it says is truly bizarre to a lawyer accustomed to the now well accepted doctrine of judicial independence, whereas the second hook is a little obscure. As usual, I have carried out some minor copyediting as well as the review. Bahnfrend (talk) 09:06, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Bahnfrend: Many thanks for your kind words and especially for improving the sometimes bumpy prose of the article. I appreciate it! WatkynBassett (talk) 12:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]