Talk:Military Service Act 1916

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Ambiguity (section Ireland)[edit]

I am sure this sentence needs more clarifying phrasing as well as possibly citations to add:

The government and the Irish media had wrongly blamed Sinn Féin, then a small monarchist political party with little popular support for the rebellion, even though it had not been involved.

It does not easily make sense to me - Sinn Fein was a republican party - unless the sentence means to say that Sinn Fein were blamed first, and then the blame was shifted to a separate, monarchist, party, which ought to be named - the Ulster Unionist Party certainly were monarchist, were they pro-conscription within the island?. Cloptonson (talk) 20:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Navy and conscription (section The Act)[edit]

I see it is stated the Act excepted sailors of the Royal Navy from conscription. I had long understood that being part of the British armed forces the Navy took conscripts in that stage of WWI. It would clarify matters if it could be stated whether or not the Navy was all-volunteer through the war and whether or not those called up under the MSA were allowed to enter the Navy in preference.Cloptonson (talk) 20:17, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]