Talk:Midas (Shelley play)

Midas (Shelley play) has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 1, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 5, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Mary Shelley's verse drama Midas is a commentary on both Ovid's Metamorphoses and Chaucer's The Wife of Bath's Tale?

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA pseudo-review[edit]

Near the end of the plot summary, one of the characters determines to check under Midas' crown when he is sleeping. Does he?

It does not appear that he does, no. Awadewit (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the reception section, it says that, after a long period when they were ignored, modern researchers have decided to analyse Mary Shelley's other work. What have they said about Midas? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 00:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is in the "Genre" and "Style and themes" section. Awadewit (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Midas (Shelley)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Successful good article nomination[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of July 9, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Understandable and clear use of language.

2. Factually accurate?: Good use of notes/bibliography.

3. Broad in coverage?: Covers multiple different aspects of the work, broken up into subsections Background, Writing and publication, Plot summary, Genre, Style and themes, and Reception.

4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be written in a neutral manner.

5. Article stability? Stable since May 2008 creation, no issues in article history or on talk page.

6. Images?: All images used are on Wikimedia Commons, no issues here.

Excellent work, well done yet again by Awadewit (talk · contribs) If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 05:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]