Talk:Michael Feingold

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 30 March 2019 by reviewer Breawycker (talk · contribs).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Footnote 'a'[edit]

Shall we move the text of footnote 'a' to the place in the article where it is cited? I believe it belongs there as an important fact about Feingold and the Obies, rather than being buried at the bottom where it is hardly noticeable. Wigly Pigly (talk) 19:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I put it in a footnotre because it's really not about Feingold, per se, but about Havel and the Obies, and a footnote seemed a better solution than either leaving it out, or making it parenthetical in the body. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:40, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Though it is about Havel winning the Obies, Feingold presented them. It seems to me that is an important fact, given that Havel was a political figure as well as a playwright, and the Obies were chaired by Feingold. Wigly Pigly (talk) 00:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, which is why it's in the article in the first place, but it's not primarily about something Feingold was responsible for, except insofar as he voted for the award as one of the judges. Whoever was the Chairman at the time -- if Feingold wasn't -- would have presented it. If there was additional information showing how Feingold pushed for the award for Havel, or some other personal involvement, I would feel differently. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:23, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let's leave it where it is and see if some other editors weigh in.Wigly Pigly (talk) 03:21, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]