Talk:Memphis & Arkansas Bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Memphis & Arkansas Bridge - no pedestrians[edit]

I was surprised to see that the Wiki entry for this bridge mentioned pedestrian/bicycle conveyance because biking sites all say there is no crossing at Memphis. I contacted the Tennessee Department of Transportation and received a response indicating that there are NO pedestrian or bicycle facilities on this bridge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.30.79.69 (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, the bicyclists I see going across it all the time are just a figment of my imagination? This bridge is visible from my window. I know that I probably can't source that view to Wikipedia's standards, but the facts are still the facts. I say this as somebody who has actually used that pedestrian walkway myself, albeit not bicycling. -- Otto 19:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-- Additional: Here's the pedestrian entrance on the Memphis side: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=memphis,+tn&ie=UTF8&ll=35.125345,-90.073326&spn=0.00093,0.002704&t=h&z=19
-- Additional-additional: Here's some photos of it: http://bridgehunter.com/photos/10/89/108918-M.jpg http://bridgehunter.com/photos/10/89/108919-M.jpg

Memphis & Arkansas Bridge - pedestrians INDEED![edit]

OK, I stand corrected. Or, rather, the Tennessee Highway Department does! At any rate, Otto is right. I drove to Memphis a couple of weeks ago and crossed the Mississippi River on the I-55 bridge. There is indeed a pedestrian walkway just outside the steel girders that seems wide enough for bicycle traffic. There may be some trouble in getting to the bridge from the Arkansas side on a bicycle, as the access roads do not provide convenient access to the interstate right-of-way. However, an perspicacious (and, no doubt, perspiring) individual could find a way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.30.79.69 (talk) 16:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did a bit more research and found that the Mississippi River Trail includes the I-55 bridge as a potential bicycling path, although their maps do mark it as dangerous and with a potential routing hazard. More info and maps at http://www.mississippirivertrail.org/ . -- Otto 18:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hah! The Tenn. Dept. of Transportation knows about the Mississippi River Trail crossing the bridge too: http://www.tdot.state.tn.us/documents/MRCexecsum.pdf , towards the bottom. -- Otto 18:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but now the last two paragraphs in the main Wiki page are redundant. Should the first (i.e., most recent) be removed? By the way, I sent the brochure cited above to the Tennessee DOT employee who emailed me his emphatic assertion that the the ped/bike access was nonexistent. No response as yet.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.30.79.69 (talk) 22:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well, expecting government employees to admit they're wrong is a rather futile effort, in my experience. Anyway, if the pedestrian access is non-existant, I wonder how the hell I walked out over the Mississippi River last weekend? I didn't know I had the power to float in mid-air! I could take over the WORLD! -- Otto 16:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was just out there Friday (the weather was amazing!) and took lots of photographs on my walking venture from E. H. Crump Park to Arkansas and back. I went out across on the south sidewalk, crossed under the west end of the bridge, and came back across on the north sidewalk. There's a little debris here and there, and no way to get anywhere important in Arkansas for two miles (the Bridgeport Road exit doesn't connect to West Memphis), but the real adventurer would consider this crossing tame, despite the wind and vibration from every passing 18-wheeler. So I slightly rewrote the paragraph here describing it, and merging it in with the last paragraph about the MRT. weetbixkid (talk) 21:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]