Talk:McCalla Field

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It appears to me that some of the details for McCalla Field are confused with the details for Leeward Point Field. If you look up McCalla field on a map (eg. Google Maps) it appears abandoned as an airfield, and at the very least it's runway doesn't align 10/28. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable can clear this up. Tomato (talk) 20:52, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One or three runways?[edit]

This article states that McCalla Field had one 8,000-foot runway, but the article about Guantánamo Bay naval base states that the field had three shorter runways. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.61.222.81 (talk) 18:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on McCalla Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]