Talk:Maulana Marghoobur Rahman

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Maulana Marghoobur Rahman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article name ?[edit]

@TheAafi: Maulana Marghubur Rahman or Marghubur Rahman Bijnori ?? Owais Al Qarni (talk) 12:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Owais Al Qarni, I did made a search online. I couldn't get any reliable source adding the Bijnori suffix. If there are any sources inline with COMMON NAME policy, I would consider making a move. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 11:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TheAafi: Is it reliable source? Owais Al Qarni (talk) 12:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Owais Al Qarni, No. I wouldn't consider it to be reliable at least per the WP:RS criteria. It is a self published article on a social network site. That's it. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 21:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For improvement[edit]

@IbnShahab: Please, read this Article Owais Al Qarni (talk) 12:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]